RE: EvalTF agenda

Regrets from me for tonight's meeting - feeling decidedly rotten!  Actually, not that bad, it's just a virus, but don't think I can stay up late enough to make any sense tonight.




Regards

Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(cs)
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
v.conway@ecu.edu.au
v.conway@webkeyit.com
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
________________________________________
From: Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012 8:21 PM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: EvalTF agenda

Dear Eval TF,

The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 23 August 2012 at:
  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
  * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time

Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>

The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
  * +1.617.761.6200
  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP

We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
  * port: 6665
  * channel: #eval


AGENDA:

#1. Welcome, Scribe

#2. Comments from WCAG WG Review (ED 30 July)
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Aug/0034
- Especially the first comment in the accompanying e-mail by Loretta Guarino Reid:
"This note reads very prescriptively for an informative document. If it is
meant to be normative, the task force should recharter to produce a
normative document. Otherwise, the "requirement" and  "conformance"
language should be softened."
( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Aug/0034.html )

#3. Open comments from Eval TF Review (ED 30 July)
  http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120730

#4. Other issues

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

CRICOS IPC 00279B

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 11:34:14 UTC