- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:24:12 +0200
- To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
- CC: 'Eval TF' <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Kerstin, Please note that minutes can sometimes be out of context or incomplete (as opposed to verbatim transcripts). We've opened an issue in response to your repeated comments: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/6> The group did not feel we could address this in the upcoming draft. Regards, Shadi On 22.8.2012 23:07, Kerstin Probiesch wrote: > Hi all, > > just a small statement about: > > "Since not sure how we define goodness and objectivity. How can we define > it? Don't see need to discuss. " > > As described several times: "Goodness criteria" and also "objectivity" is > defined already because they are part of the terminology of evaluation > methodology in general. > > Best > > Kerstin > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org] >> Gesendet: Montag, 20. August 2012 16:35 >> An: Eval TF >> Betreff: Minutes for Teleconference on 16 August 2012 >> >> Eval TF, >> >> Please find the minutes for the teleconference on 16 August 2012: >> - <http://www.w3.org/2012/08/16-eval-minutes> >> >> Next meeting: Thursday 23 August 2012. >> >> >> Regards, >> Shadi >> >> -- >> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ >> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office >> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) >> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 23:24:37 UTC