- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:11:00 +0200
- To: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Emmanuelle, Your objection to the proposed resolution for comment #48 was discussed in yesterday's teleconference discussion: - <http://www.w3.org/2012/08/09-eval-minutes.html#item08> We understood from your survey response that the proposed rationale for the resolution is incorrect: - <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/evaltfq4/results#x2630> The rationale has now been updated to read "In many circumstances techniques may not be able to be provided and evaluation would have to proceed with out them. Techniques may not be available to the evaluator so that this clause cannot be required. Note also that techniques are not required for WCAG 2.0 conformance". Please confirm whether you accept or object to the group resolution. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 08:11:38 UTC