- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:42:58 +0200
- To: 'Vincent François' <vfrancois@accessibiliteweb.com>, <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01ac01cc7935$ecf44200$c6dcc600$@sidar.org>
Hi all, I’m sorry but I have had an unexpected long, long, meeting L Regards, Emmanuelle De: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] En nombre de Vincent François Enviado el: jueves, 22 de septiembre de 2011 1:07 Para: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org Asunto: Agenda 22 September (was Agenda 21 September) Hi Eric, 22 September, not 21... Le 11-09-21 16:55, Velleman, Eric a écrit : Dear Eval TF, The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 21 September 2011 at: * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET) * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT) * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone: - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL") * +1.617.761.6200 * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org) * IRC server: irc.w3.org * port: 6665 * channel: #eval AGENDA: #1. Welcome #2. Discussing the requirements Please find the requirements page at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html>. During our call, we will discuss the proposals made on the mailing list and in the previous call: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20110915.html>Proposed changes: a. Replace 'Critical path analyses' by 'complete processes' (like used in WCAG 2.0) b. In section Goals add: 'The methodology will cross-tested and will include a reference to the test results'. c. In section Goals add: Reason why we need the Methodology (Kostas) d. In section Goals: Do we want to add both preliminary and full evaluation? Proposal is to work on full evaluation of web pages and/or a full website. e. In section Scope make subheading: 'coordination with other groups' and use scope also for scope of the methodology (Detlev) f. In section Scope add: 'Members of the Task Force will monitor the work in the authoring tools accessibility guidelines (ATAG) working group: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ and the developing ATAG2.0 specification'. g. Keep R03: Unique interpretation The Methodology is uniquely interpretable to people who want to use it. It should make it clear to users what they can do if they choose a certain evaluation approach in the document. h. Add requirement: Support for independent verification: The Methodology supports independent verification and quality control of the evaluation results. i. Add requirement: Objectivity: no objectivity, no standardized methodology? j. Add requirement: Validity #3. Face to Face meeting Who could host a meeting at CSUN or elsewhere? #4. Any other business Regards, Eric -- Vincent François Directeur général Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb 1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111 Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6 vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com http://www.accessibiliteweb.com <http://www.accessibiliteweb.com/> Tél. : +1 514-312-3378 Sans frais : +1 877-315-5550
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 14:43:39 UTC