- From: Boland Jr, Frederick E. <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:15:51 -0400
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- CC: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
If the document we are working on will be a specification, perhaps it is not too early to evaluate our developing work against the requirements and good practices of the W3C Quality Assurance Framework Specification Guidelines (QASpecGL): http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ Will our document meet all of the requirements of QASpecGL? Another (general) definition of "methodology" from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/methodology Another (general) definition of "website" from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/web+site Perhaps there are definitions of these terms elsewhere in W3C - if so maybe we could consider them for consistency if possible? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST ________________________________________ From: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra [shadi@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:49 AM To: Eric Velleman; Eval TF Subject: scope of "methodology" Hi Eric, All, In relation to agenda item #e, here is one attempt to outline and scope the "methodology". One definition for "methodology" could be: - Process to assess the conformance of entire websites to a particular level of WCAG 2.0. We would then also need to define "website"; here is a proposal for it: - A coherent collection of one or more related web pages that together provide common use or functionality. It includes static websites, dynamically generated websites (aka CMS-driven), and web applications (aka client-side scripting). Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 11:16:40 UTC