Friday, 30 September 2011
Thursday, 29 September 2011
- Re: Conformance claims - impact on requirements
- Re: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
- Re: Comments on Target Audience
- [updated *again*] Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- Re: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- RE: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
- RE: Comments on Target Audience
- Re: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
- Re: Comments on Target Audience
- AW: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- Re: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- RE: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- RE: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- Re: Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- RE: [updated URL] Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- Comment on Requirements RO3, R04, proposal to include Validity
- [updated URL] Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- Re: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
- RE: EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- EvalTF Agenda 29 September
- Re: Minutes for Teleconference on 22 September 2011
- Re: Conformance claims - impact on requirements
- Re: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
- RE: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
- RE: informational resources list on measuring web accessibility?
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Friday, 23 September 2011
Thursday, 22 September 2011
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- RE: Comments on Target Audience - websites and web content
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites and web content
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites
- Re: Comments on Target Audience
- Comments on Target Audience
- RE: Agenda 22 September (was Agenda 21 September)
- late to evaltf meeting today
- Re: Agenda 22 September
- Re: Agenda 22 September
- Re: Agenda 22 September
- some tips for using the basic teleconference tools
- RE: additional requirements
- RE: scope of "methodology"
- RE: scope of "methodology"
- Re: Methodology excluding interpretation?
- scope of "methodology"
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Additional Requiirement: documentation
- Methodology excluding interpretation?
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: additional requirements
- Re: Additional Requiirement: documentation
- Re: additional requirements
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Agenda 22 September (was Agenda 21 September)
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- additional requirements
- RE: Carter image - quick alt text exercise - do not reply to list
- Agenda 21 September
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- RE: Additional Requiirement: documentation
- RE: Terminology: critical
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Terminology: critical
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
- RE: Regrets from Liz fong, NIST this Thurday (9/22) and Next Thursday (9/29)
- Additional Requiirement: documentation
Monday, 19 September 2011
- Re: Face-to-face meetings
- Carter image - quick alt text exercise - do not reply to list
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Face-to-face meetings
- RE: Face-to-face meetings
- Re: Face-to-face meetings
- Re: Additional Requirement - Validity
- Re: Face-to-face meetings
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- RE: Terminology: critical
Sunday, 18 September 2011
- Re: Face to face at CSUN
- Re: Face to face at CSUN
- Additional Requirement - Validity
- Re: Requirements - R11: Critical path analyses
- Re: Face-to-face meetings
- RE: Face-to-face meetings
Friday, 16 September 2011
- Re: Requirements - R11: Critical path analyses
- Face-to-face meetings
- RE: Face to face at CSUN
- RE: Face to face at CSUN
- Re: Requirements - R11: Critical path analyses
- Re: Terminology: critical
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- RE: Face to face at CSUN
- Re: Requirements - R11: Critical path analyses
Thursday, 15 September 2011
- Sorry I missed the Teleconference on 15 September 2011
- Fwd: Call for Papers: Web Accessibility Metrics - Online Symposium
- Requirements
- RE: Minutes for Teleconference on 15 September 2011
- RE: Minutes for Teleconference on 15 September 2011
- Re: Terminology: critical
- Minutes for Teleconference on 15 September 2011
- Re: Face to face at CSUN
- Terminology: critical
- Face to face at CSUN
- discussion overview on requirements
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Input for agenda
- RE: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
- various items relating to evaluation methodology
- Re: Requirements draft - objectivity
- Agenda EvalTF 15 September 2011
- RE: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
- Re: AW: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- RE: Requirements draft
- Re: AW: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- AW: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- RE: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- Re: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- RE: Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- Do we share an understanding of "requirement"?
- RE: Requirements draft
- AW: Requirements draft
- RE: AW: Requirements draft
Monday, 12 September 2011
- Re: Requirements draft
- Re: AW: Requirements draft
- Re: AW: Requirements draft
- AW: Requirements draft
- Re: Requirements draft
- AW: Requirements draft
- AW: Requirements draft
- Re: Requirements draft
Sunday, 11 September 2011
- Requirements draft
- Re: some comments/questions on techniques instructions document for submitters
- Regrets for 15th september
- AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
Saturday, 10 September 2011
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- RE: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
Friday, 9 September 2011
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- "end-to-end" factors in accessibility evaluation?
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- Re: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- RE: Requirements draft target audience
- RE: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- RE: possible structure for us to use in an accessibility evaluation document?
Thursday, 8 September 2011
- AW: Requirements draft target audience
- Re: possible use of test assertions in defining/expressing requirements?
- Re: possible use of test assertions in defining/expressing requirements?
- Re: possible use of test assertions in defining/expressing requirements?
- Re: Requirements draft target audience
- Re: possible use of test assertions in defining/expressing requirements?
- AW: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
- Tracker -- tool for tracking actions and issues
- AW: Fwd: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
- Re: Requirements draft target audience
- EvalTF telco cancelled
- possible structure for us to use in an accessibility evaluation document?
Friday, 2 September 2011
Monday, 5 September 2011
- Re: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- RE: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- Re: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
Saturday, 3 September 2011
- Re: AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation
- AW: Additional Point/Question: problem centered / page centered evaluation