- From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:31:52 +0100
- To: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
- Cc: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi all, I think the way of finding Complete Processes might differ from the case. If it is an ordered test one possible way could be: asking the client if there are any Complete Processes and where. This is not possible in comparative studies. Sometimes one can find Complete Process when using the site search for example searching for "Registration" or something similar. Some types of websites typical have Complete Processes (shoping and booking sites, hotels,...). Because of that it might be a good way to recommend different ways of finding Processes. Probably we should collect use cases for the Methodology, as it was suggested from Shadi some weeks ago. I think this might be helpful for the scope but also for the question of Complete Processes. Thoughts? Best Kerstin 2011/11/29 Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>: > Dear all, > > My question is how do you find 'complete processes' - especially for a large > or very large website??? > > In order to claim conformance for the whole website, at least from my > understanding, it would seem that any and all complete processes contained > in the website must be found and checked (please read Understanding > Requirement 3 - Complete Processes > in http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/conformance). > > I have been looking at the use of the "Top paths" information from website > analytics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_traffic), but am not entirely > sure that this fulfils the need... > > Interested in thoughts / comments on any other approaches... > > All the best > > Alistair ------------------------------------- Kerstin Probiesch - Accessibility Consultant Kantstraße 10/19 | 35039 Marburg Web: http://www.barrierefreie-informationskultur.de XING: http://www.xing.com/profile/Kerstin_Probiesch Twitter: http://twitter.com/kprobiesch ------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:32:30 UTC