- From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:59:31 +0000
- To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Input questions for agenda point 4: Thanks to Roberto, Shadi, all * Is the "evaluation methodology" expected to be carried out by one person or by a group of more than one persons? * What is the expected level of expertise (in accessibility, in web technologies etc) of persons carrying out an evaluation? * Is the involvement of people with disabilities a necessary part of carrying out an evaluation versus an improvement of the quality? * Are the individual test results binary (ie pass/fail) or a score (discrete value, ratio, etc)? * How are these test results aggregated into an overall score (plain count, weighted count, heuristics, etc)? * Is it useful to have a "confidence score" for the tests (for example depending on the degree of subjectivity or "difficulty")? * Is it useful to have a "confidence score" for the aggregated result (depending on how the evaluation is carried out) ========================= Eric Velleman Technisch directeur Stichting Accessibility Universiteit Twente Oudenoord 325, 3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands); Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270 www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu / www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer Accessibility is Member van het W3C =========================
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:03:00 UTC