- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:18:52 +0100
- To: Yod Samuel Martín <samuelm@dit.upm.es>, 'ERT WG' <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Samuel, That is a good point. We can discuss that Wednesday in detail. My view on this is that an assessment can be performed with the overview of the features described in the document. On 28/11/13 12:07, Yod Samuel Martín wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to transmit some feedback I recently got while attending > DSAI 2013 conference, where I presented a paper which cited our work on > AERT (working acronym :-) ) > > Currently, the title reads “Guidance on the development and assessment > of web accessibility evaluation tools”. The day after my presentation, a > person inquired me why the title talked about “assessment”. My answer > was mainly that: > > -The document will provide a series of features that evaluation tools > may have, and a set of profiles against which evaluation tools may be > matched. Maybe the last part is what is related to the assessment. > > -The title had recently changed to add that word (which is true indeed, > I had just needed to change my slides as I noticed the change while I > was preparing them). > > -The work I had presented was mainly focused on providing some guidance > to developers, other people at the WG might provide a more appropriate > answer. > > Anyway, I would like to raise that point, just in case the motivation > for the “assessment” part would not be clear enough, or the wording > could be more precise. > > Regards, > > Samuel. > -- Best Regards, Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Saludos, carlos Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 15:19:28 UTC