- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:46:04 +0100
- To: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
- Cc: 'Christophe Strobbe' <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
hi Emmanuelle, I disagree with you ;-) . Pleasing a person as argument is not a logic decision IMHO. For me, as implementer, the conformance section fits better at the end of any spec, because first I need to know about its components, and then about its conformance requirements. On 23/11/11 23:33, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo wrote: > Hi Christophe: > > You've done an awesome job. Although I think it unnecessary, for we > have believed you will not need to collect all the examples. > > I think that since there is no consistency, the issue can be solved > by giving pleasure to the person requesting to be put at the > beginning. > > All the best, ... -- Best Regards, carlos Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/ imergo®: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 08:46:49 UTC