- From: Philip Ackermann <philip.ackermann@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 09:19:39 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, you're right. I thought we would update generally all namespaces. regards, Philip On 05/04/2011 12:07 AM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Why update the namespace if the RDF did not change? > > Best, > Shadi > > > On 3.5.2011 20:31, Philip Ackermann wrote: >> Hi Shadi, >> >> approval with suggested changes: >> >> 1.2. Document conventions >> -Update pointer namespace to 2011 (also necessary in [1] in section 1.1. >> Namespaces) >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Pointers/WD-Pointers-in-RDF10-20110427 >> >> regards, >> Philip >> >> Am 28.04.2011 12:16, schrieb Shadi Abou-Zahra: >>> Dear Group, >>> >>> The 27 April 2011 Editors Draft of EARL 1.0 Schema is ready for review >>> and approval for publication as Last Call Working Draft: >>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110427> >>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/schema.rdf> >>> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> >>> >>> Please indicate one of the following by *Wednesday 4 May 2011*: >>> - approval for publication as-is; >>> - approval for publication with suggested changes (please provide); >>> - approval for publication only with changes made (please provide); >>> - objection to publication due to concerns (please provide); >>> - abstain from voting. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shadi >>> >> >> > -- Philip Ackermann Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142639
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 07:20:16 UTC