- From: Christophe Strobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:24:47 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:48:02 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > ERT WG, > > The next teleconference is scheduled for Wednesday 27 April 2011 at: > * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Time (CET) > * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (ET) > * 05:30 to 06:30 North American Pacific Time (PT) I may be up to 15 minutes late due to a meeting in another building that ends at 14.30 CET. Best regards, Christophe > > Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise > date for your own time zone: > - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html> > > The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3794 - "ERWG") > * +1.617.761.6200 > * +33.4.26.46.79.03 (limited lines, please use +1 number or VoIP if > you can) > * +44.203.318.0479 (limited lines, please use +1 number or VoIP if you > can) > * SIP / VoIP - http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP > > We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org) > * IRC server: irc.w3.org > * port: 6665 > * channel: #er > > > AGENDA: > > #1. Welcome > - minutes from last meeting: > -- <http://www.w3.org/2011/04/20-er-minutes> > - reminder of recent resolutions > -- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0037> > - reminder of the issues lists: > -- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> > -- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/guide-issues> > -- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/issues> > -- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/issues> > -- <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Pointers/issues> > > > #2. [EARL 1.0 Schema] reviewing open notes > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note1> > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note2> > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note3> > - are there particular notes we want to have in the new draft? > > > #3. [HTTP-in-RDF] reviewing open notes > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/#introduction> > - are there particular notes we want to have in the new draft? > > > #4. [Content-in-RDF] reviewing open notes > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/#ContentClass> > - are there particular notes we want to have in the new draft? > > > #5. [Pointers-in-RDF] reviewing open notes > - review: <http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers-in-RDF/#namespaceMappingClass> > - are there particular notes we want to have in the new draft? > > > #6. Any other business > - are there additional suggestions for the document editors? > > > #7. Upcoming meeting schedule > - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline#meeting> > > > Regards, > Shadi -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 www.docarch.be Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:25:27 UTC