- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:15:03 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Dear ERT WG,
Please find below a description of the "Content Class issue" [1]. Feel
free to comment in advance of the meeting.
[1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/issues#ContentClass>
Original comment by Robert Sanderson:
-
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2010Jun/0000.html>
Initial response by Johannes Koch:
- <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2010Jun/0001.html>
Essence of the comment:
- use "dct:isFormatOf" and "dc:hasFormat" rather than "rdf:about" and
"dct:source" to express relationships between content representations
and between the original source
Following that suggestion, RDF code that currently looks like this:
[[
<cnt:ContentAsBase64 rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home.png">
<cnt:bytes>77+9UE5HDQoaCgAAAA1JSERSAAAASAAAADAIAwAAAO+{...}</cnt:bytes>
</cnt:ContentAsBase64>
]]
Would then look like this:
[[
<cnt:ContentAsBase64 rdf:ID="optinallyGeneratedID">
<cnt:bytes>77+9UE5HDQoaCgAAAA1JSERSAAAASAAAADAIAwAAAO+{...}</cnt:bytes>
<dct:isFormatOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home.png"/>
</cnt:ContentAsBase64>
]]
Proposed resolution:
- accept these changes
Thoughts?
Regards,
Shadi
--
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
WAI International Program Office Activity Lead |
W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 22:15:26 UTC