- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:48:30 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Dear ERT WG, Following recent discussions, it seem that there is consensus for the "conformance sections" to move out of the vocabulary definition specs (EARL 1.0 Schema, HTTP-in-RDF, ...) and put them "elsewhere". Before attempting to create yet a new spec document, I would like to see if we can change the current Guide from an introductory resource into something more substantial. Remember, the guide document is on Rec-Track (because it has been split from the previous EARL spec). To initiate the discussion I propose changing the title and content from "EARL 1.0 Guide" to "Developer Guide for EARL 1.0". The outline for this [new] document would include: * combine sections 3 & 4, and shorten them editorially (some examples and text are more verbose then necessary) * add a section on conformance for reports, consumers, and producers (maybe it won't be called "conformance" though) * add a new section on serialization with sub-sections for XML and possibly JSON What do people think of this approach and suggestion? Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 08:48:55 UTC