Re: First pass on EARL Guide

Hi all,

The correct link is:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20090723.html>

Note: I've replaces the CSS from a formal WD to an ED again.

Regards,
   Shadi


Michael A Squillace wrote:
> 
> All:
> 
> I have uploaded a first pass with editorial changes to the EARL 1.0 Guide (
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Guide-20090723/). Notice that this is
> the same version that Shadi uploaded back in July (i.e. I did not create a
> new document). Carlos, I apologize in advance for removing the
> word-wrapping that your editor produced but it made it very difficult to
> read the markup because it broke up elements in odd places and made it
> extremely difficult to determine where paragraphs were beginning and ending
> in the markup.  It also placed line breaks in <pre> elements where they
> probably did not belong. I tried, so far as possible, to make the markup
> consistent with our other documents.
> 
> Things to review:
> 1. reworded 2nd and 3rd objectives in section 1
> 2. In 2nd example in section 3.1, the XHTML example does not contain any
> <li> or <img> elements so the errors to be found do not make sense
> 3. might want to underscore in the text the main differences between code
> in examples 3.18 and 3.19, english and spanish representations as well as
> resulting reports for each (3.21 and 3.22)
> 
> Questions for the group:
> 1. Towards the end of section 2, "However, this original aim has been
> expanded to cover wider testing scenarios." What testing scenarios did we
> have in mind? No examples given.
> 2. aggregation = "merging different sets of test results on the same
> subject"; this is not in accordance of what we agreed to as aggregation,
> which was simply the combination of different portions of EARL reports into
> one report or of the results of several reports into one report
> 3. standard boiler plate about rfc 2119 is just dangling at end of section
> 2; better place for it?
> 4. Beginning of Section 3 lists vocabularies upon which EARL depends and
> lists HTTP in RDF, Content in RDF, Pointers in RDF. These three are part of
> EARL, not vocabularies upon which it depend, so I wonder if these should be
> referenced separately as part of the EARL vocabulary itself.
> 
> --> Mike Squillace
> IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
> 
> W:512.286.8694
> M:512.970.0066
> 
> External: http://www.ibm.com/able
> Internal: http://w3.ibm.com/able

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 08:18:24 UTC