- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:54:28 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, Johannes Koch wrote: > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >> Hi Johannes, Carlos, >> >> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/schema.rdf> >> >> Unless there is a reason not to, we should employ the same OWL header >> and constructors approach in the HTTP-in-RDF, Content-in-RDF, and >> Pointers-in-RDF specs, as we do in the EARL 1.0 Schema. > > See attached files. I aligned the owl:Ontology stuff and added > > <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/> > > to the properties. Thank you. The files have been updated: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/http.rdf> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/content.rdf> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2009 20:54:57 UTC