- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:34:55 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dear group, This is somewhat related to the other thread on conformance: - <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0048> See also the thread on the OWL ontology header: - <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0036> Please cast your vote on whether we should use owl:imports to import each of the HTTP-in-RDF, Content-in-RDF, and Pointers-in-RDF ontologies into the EARL 1.0 Schema ontology: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/earl.rdf> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 11:35:29 UTC