- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:23:10 +0200
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Johannes, Johannes Koch wrote: > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >> Dear group, >> >> Refs: >> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610> >> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/schema.rdf> >> >> The EARL 1.0 Schema document and RDF file have been updated and need >> review and approval. Please consider the following questions: >> >> #1. Section 1.2: Namespaces >> - are the namespace URIs and the references correct? > > Change "Dublin Core (DC) namespace" to "Dublin Core Metadata Terms > namespace". Better use the dct prefix for properties from the > http://purl.org/dc/terms/ namespace (throughout the document). OK, will make these fixes. >> #2. Section 2.7: OutcomeValue >> - the term names and definitions have been modified (compare with the >> currently published version of EARL 1.0 Schema [1]). Is that OK? > > OK > >> #3. Section 4.1: Conforming Reports >> - two paragraphs added at the end of this section. Is that OK? > > OK > >> #6. Misc Questions >> - Document source: do we want to add XML namespaces for DC etc? > > What for? Don't know, that's why I'm asking. I've seen this in some specs, like FOAF for example. I don't know if it has use for GRDDL or such. >> - TestMode section: we need a resolution to drop "Note 2" > > Do you mean Note 2 in the OutcomeValue section? Sorry for being so unclear. I mean Note 2 in the TestMode section of the previous published draft: - <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090428/#note2> Thanks, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 10:47:08 UTC