Re: [EARL 1.0 Guide] document updated

Comments thus far:
1. Shadi - previous internal version points to editors draft of May 25, 
2009 while latest internal version points to draft of April 22, 2009. I 
can update .htaccess if you'd like.
2. abstract may be a little sparse for the new reader. Also, need to 
review wording to ensure that EARL is now understood as a colection of 
vocabularies and not just the EARL Schema
3. I really like the descriptions of the first set of use cases but the 
second set is a little vague - not sure how these are "not limited to the 
web," as suggested by the paragraph prior to the list. This returns us to 
a question that I thought we answered in the Requirements document, 
namely, that we should attempt, so far as possible, not to entertain 
contexts for EARL outside the web.
4. at the beginning of section 3, should distinguish between external 
specifications and those which are a part of the EARL framework
5. in example 3.11, want to use 'failed' instances, not 'Fail' class from 
EARL Schema; same holds for ex 3.16 and Pass v. passed
6. not sure we need conclusion, section 5

All and all, coming along very well, I think.

--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center

W:512.286.8694
M:512.970.0066

External: http://www.ibm.com/able
Internal: http://w3.ibm.com/able



Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org
06/16/2009 07:49 AM

To
ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
cc

Subject
[EARL 1.0 Guide] document updated






Dear group,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20090616>

The EARL 1.0 Guide document has been updated according to the previous 
comments (except for some examples in Section 4). Please review it 
carefully for discussion this week.


Regards,
   Shadi

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |