- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:06:23 +0200
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, "ERT WG" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> As per my action item I've checked with Ivan and got
> confirmation that adding OWL constructs is a good idea. He adds:
>
> > B.t.w, this is actually the core of what the new OWL group calls
> > Profiles, especially OWL RL profiles:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#OWL_2_RL
> >
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Grap
> > hs_using_Rules
>
> CarlosI, would be great if you could get suggestions from Diego.
I have checked with Diego and he told me that the main thing it to declare the classes as rdfs:Class and owl:Class instances. In RDF/XML we can use <rdf:type>, for example:
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="....">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
<!-- ... -->
</rdfs:Class>
Which is the abbreviated for:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="...">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class"/>
</rdf:Description>
Simmilary, he also suggests to declare the properties as owl:DatatypeProperty or owl:ObjectProperty, apart from rdf:Property.
Regards,
CI.
____________________
Carlos Iglesias
Fundación CTIC
Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España
teléfono: +34 984291212
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 10:07:32 UTC