- From: Michael A Squillace <masquill@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:20:50 -0500
- To: "ERT WG " <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFABAFDC88.315A5943-ON852575C9.004976BE-862575C9.00497C62@us.ibm.com>
+1 --> Mike Squillace IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center W:512.286.8694 M:512.970.0066 External: http://www.ibm.com/able Internal: http://w3.ibm.com/able Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> Sent by: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org 06/02/2009 05:52 AM To ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org> cc Subject foaf:Document Hi group, Ref: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Document> This is to confirm that FOAF spec uses the broader sense of the term "Document" to mean both physical as well as electronic manifestations. We could clarify which of the two we mean in section 2.3 TestSubject Class of the EARL 1.0 Schema [1], by using the following description: - foaf:Document: * Document - the test subject is an electronic document, such as an HTML or image file, as defined by [FOAF]. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090428/#TestSubject> This would clarify the scope in the context of using this term in EARL reports, and would therefore resolve the comment by CTIC [2]. [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009May/0023> Thoughts? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:23:19 UTC