- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:11:44 +0200
- To: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi group, in EARL we defined the outcome values as sub-classes of earl:OutcomeValue, and the test modes as sub-classes of earl:TestMode. Should we use the same approach for the methods and status codes in HTTP-in-RDF? E.g.: <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#CONNECT"> <dc:title xml:lang="en">CONNECT</dc:title> <dc:description xml:lang="en">The HTTP CONNECT method</dc:description> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt"/> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2006/http#Method"/> </rdfs:Class> and <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#StatusCode1xx"> <dc:title xml:lang="en">Informational</dc:title> <dc:description xml:lang="en">A status code starting with 1</dc:description> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2006/http#StatusCode"/> </rdfs:Class> <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#StatusCode100"> <dc:title xml:lang="en">Continue</dc:title> <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource="#statusCodeGroup1xx"/> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt"/> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2006/http-statusCodes#StatusCode1xx"/> </rdfs:Class> I'm currently not sure about the header names. -- Johannes Koch Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 08:12:24 UTC