- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:10:17 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Johannes, all, Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > >> It is indeed clearer and is simpler for sub-classing. For example, you >> can create a my:probablyPass class from earl:cannotTell pretty easily >> because it is defined as a class. This is an essential functionality. > > The earl:Outcome http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#cannotTell is not a class, > it's a resource. Do you mean the resource of type class can not be sub-classed (ie to say "my:probablyPass - rdfs:subclassOf - earl:cannotTell")? If so, then we would need to rethink this structure... Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 14:11:27 UTC