- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:47:35 +0100
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, > > If you don't have any declared accessibility supported technology you > can't be WCAG conformant, so I would say that without any of this lists > nobody can be WCAG conformant and I think this is a good reason to not > proceed to REC. > > > > On the other hand, what's the problem with providing a base > accessibility supported web technologies list (e.g. just HTML)? > > > > Anyway we can wait for implementations during CR and see what happens. > > Some of the problems: who would be responsible to evaluate if every Web > technology provides sufficient accessibility support in every situation? > Who would maintain such a list of inventory? Not an easy task... I just said it's necessary, not easy. This is why I proposed the "base list" with just HTML. Regards, CI. ______________________ Carlos Iglesias Fundación CTIC Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España teléfono: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 14:47:50 UTC