- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:26 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Johannes Koch schrieb: > Carlos Iglesias schrieb: >> - Some times the same vocabulary as in the XML specification is used >> (e.g. xmlDecl, docTypeDecl...), > > That was just by chance :-) > >> but other the "official" names are not used. (e.g. xmlVersion instead >> of xmlVersionNum or xmlEncoding instead of xmlEncName) >> >> May we need to be consistent on this for the sake of clarity? > > Meybe, yes. I just looked at the XML 1.0 spec (<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>). The relevant terminology there is: XML spec DOM spec --------------------------------------------- XMLDecl VersionNum xmlVersion EncName xmlEncoding (SDDecl) xmlStandalone doctypedecl doctype / DocumentType Name name PubidLiteral publicId SystemLiteral systemId intSubset internalSubset I think the DOM approach is more what we want. We also have types and properties. However, I don't like calling the property for the document type name just "name". -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 16:25:43 UTC