Re: Comments and thoughts about WCAG 2.0

Hi Carlos,

Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
>> Seeing the definition of "Web page" in the glossary
>> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#webpagedef>: "obtained from a single
>> URI") I wonder if we need a way do describe the current state of a
>> frameset (which resource is loaded into which frame) and store it in RDF.
> 
> Not sure, for me it looks more like an aggregation of resources thing that an EARL one. I mean, apparently it fits better on the POWDER side than the EARL one.

I don't mean that we need it in EARL, but there's a need to use 
something designed for this use case together with EARL. Or do you use 
the xframes-URI-reference introduced in the 20051012 XFrames WD 
(<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xframes-20051012/#s_populating>) with 
XFrames using @xml:id, not @name like in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0?

-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065

Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 14:08:22 UTC