- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:04:06 +0200
- To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Carlos Iglesias wrote: >> #3. for all other test mode combinations of sub-tests, the test mode of >> the combined test is "semi-automatic". > > I think this doesn't work with the current definition of semi-automatic, > specially with the "...a software tool was primarily responsible..." > > If I have an automatic one and a manual one, why the result of the > combination must be mainly guided by a software tool? We have agreed on this new definitions for the term semi-automatic: - earl:semiAutomatic Where the test was partially carried out by the software tool, but where human input or judgment was still required to decide or help decide the outcome of the test. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0019 Does this work better now? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:04:20 UTC