Antw: RE: replacing earl:inferred with aggregation logic (Issue #7a) from Reinhard Ruemer on 2007-09-05 (public-wai-ert@w3.org from September 2007)

From: Reinhard Ruemer <Reinhard.Ruemer@jku.at>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:29:31 +0200
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-Id: <46DECB59.B98F.00B0.0@jku.at>

Hi all,
  
>> Here is
>>another attempt of the rules:
>>
>>#1. if all sub-tests were carried out in the same test mode, then the
>>test mode of the combined test is same.
>  
> OK
> 
>>#2. if the test mode of any of the sub-tests is "undisclosed", then the
>>test mode of the combined test is also "undisclosed".
>  
> OK
> 
>>#3. for all other test mode combinations of sub-tests, the test mode of
>>the combined test is "semi-automatic".
>

I also think semi-automatic is misleading. But why not define a mode called "mixed". This would suggest, that the test mode has been all (or at least two) of: automatic, semi-automatic, and/or manual?


Regards,
Reinhard

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:29:59 UTC