- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:39:56 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dear group, The issue with earl:inferred is described in the following mail: [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jul/0052> This proposal was discussed on the teleconferences of 1st and 29th of August ([2] and [3]) with no definitive resolution. However, it seems that there were several voice for "Option B" which would replace this value with a logic of how to combine sub-tests. Here is an example: - An assertion on WCAG 1.0 Level AA is made based upon the assertions of all the Priority 1 and 2 checkpoints (it isn't a test by itself, it is a combination of the tests on the checkpoint level). - Formerly the way to do this was to describe the test mode for this assertion as "inferred", to mean that it has been deduced rather than actually a result of a test execution. - A different approach could be to combine how the individual tests were carried out and make a statement on this testing mode. This seems like a more intuitive and more informative approach. Here is how a simple logic for combining test modes could look like: #1. if all sub-tests were carried out in "manual" mode, then the test mode of the combined test is "manual". #2. if all sub-tests were carried out in "automatic" mode, then the test mode of the combined test is "automatic". # 3. any combination of "manual", "automatic", or "semi-automatic" concludes that the test mode is "semi-automatic". It is also possible to keep "inferred" as an additional modifier to the test mode. However, this leads back to the question of where was it inferred from and how -the "evidence" discussion we agreed was out of scope for EARL (but rather part of a test description language). Any thoughts or comments on the above? [2] <http://www.w3.org/2007/08/29-er-minutes> [3] <http://www.w3.org/2007/08/01-er-minutes> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 08:40:01 UTC