- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:47:46 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- CC: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for doing this Johannes. Just a minor comment from a quick skim >> of the document, I appreciate the alphabetic order > > I did this intentionally in the RDF schema (Appendix A1) and the tables > (Appendix C). Any specific reason for this decision? >> but think there is a hierarchy that would make the document easier to >> understand if it is reflected appropriately. > > I agree, sections 2.5 and 2.6 could be made sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2. Yes, I think that would help readers. > There could also be a similar reason to make sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 > subsections of 2.1 :-) Very similar reason, yes... ;) Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 16:47:58 UTC