- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:54:09 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> During today's teleconference call we talked about issues #21 and #22, which related to incorporating more semantics to support "evidence" (justify the reason for the test results). We decided to reject these suggestions as they are out of scope for EARL 1.0, and we agreed to better clarify the scope of the document (as per issue #29). However, it seems we forgot to discuss issue #20 which is essentially part of the general proposal by Shuaib Karim. Unless I hear otherwise, issue #20 will also be labeled as rejected in the issues list. For more background, please find the minutes of today's call: - <http://www.w3.org/2007/05/30-er-minutes#item02> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 16:54:10 UTC