- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:10:11 +0000
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
General reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070323/ For example <quote cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070323/#terms-HTTP"> The following terms are defined by this specification: <quote> It would seem to me that the concepts you are dealing with are authoritatively defined in the HTTP RFC(s). rdfs:isDefinedBy would seem to offer a clear way to document the fact that a newly-created URI in RDF space is a pseudonym, and not the primary name, of a concept. <sketch class="rough"> foreign document is represented by a blank node which is described by a sufficient collection of dc: properties. Then makes this blank node the object of the rdfs:isDefinedBy arcs. Include this once by creating httpClass ... and httpProperty classes. </sketch> Did you consider this notation for binding these concepts that are authoritatively defined already? If not, maybe we should think about how to get this into the RDF gracefully. If so, what put you off the use of this relationship? Al
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 10:51:12 UTC