- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:38:49 +0000
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
- Cc: johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de
Hi, re: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0081.html>: >>>> I don't think we need a literal representation of the unprocessed >>>> headers, if the processed representation of the headers is >>>> equivalent to the unprocessed stuff. >>> >>> Equivalent is in the eye of the beholder. I *may* be interested that >>> my server send "aCCept-language" instead of "Accept-language". It >>> would be optional anyway... >> >> Although both header names _are_ equivalent in HTTP terms, there may >> be a usecase :-) > > 1 down, 2 more to go... ;) HTTP headers are *not* case-sensitive, see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.4.2.p.1>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2007 15:04:56 UTC