- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:12:48 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > > Johannes Koch wrote: >> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >>> >>> Johannes Koch wrote: >>>> Let me present two approaches for the same scenario: >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> a) Tool finds table with structural elements. >>>> b) Human decides whether table is layout table. >>>> >>>> 2. >>>> a) Tool finds table. >>>> b) Human decides whether table is layout table. >>>> c) Tool finds structural elements in layout table. >>>> >>>> Is one of them semiauto? >>> >>> What is the test in each of these? >> >> Check for structural elements within a layout table. > > Scenario 2 is semiauto (see mail from Charles which elaborates on this > use case). Scenario 1 seems incomplete. If the human decides that a > table is a layout table AND therefore the test is a fail, then it is > actually a manual (for example the tool is a browser toolbar). If the > tool merely asks the human "is this a layout table" and uses this input > to decide the outcome of the test, then it is semiauto. OK > So the question is not the series of atomic steps or tests but how the > overall decision is made. OK -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 19:13:23 UTC