- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:09:51 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Johannes Koch wrote: > > Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: >> SEMIAUTO: tool uses human(s) to make a decision. For example, a tool >> asks a human to verify that a given table is a layout vs data table, >> and based upon this input (and other indicators) decides the outcome >> of a test criterion. > > This is my scenario 2. which was "manual" at least according to Carlos I. > >> So in end effect its as Johannes indicated, the crucial part is if a >> human or tool actually made the *decision on the outcome in the >> context of the test criterion*. > > Let me present two approaches for the same scenario: > > 1. > a) Tool finds table with structural elements. > b) Human decides whether table is layout table. > > 2. > a) Tool finds table. > b) Human decides whether table is layout table. > c) Tool finds structural elements in layout table. > > Is one of them semiauto? What is the test in each of these? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 17:09:57 UTC