- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:53:52 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20070301> An interesting question came up during today's ERT call: do we want to specify min/max cardinality restrictions on properties in the HTTP vocabulary? For example, should there be a restriction on the number of responseCode properties in a response class? One suggestion is that we want to record full requests and responses. That means, ones that conform the the RFC requirements. This would also be useful for recording the full extent of information in EARL reports. Another suggestion is to allow incomplete requests and responses, for example to record broken interaction or when the test subject is the HTTP protocol itself (to test the conformance of a request or response). In both cases, it is important to keep in mind that the HTTP vocabulary has been designed to be stand-alone for various use cases. Therefore we should not restrict the vocabulary too much. For example, we could consider adding a section about conformance to HTTP in the appendix about limitations of the schema (appendix B) rather than hard-code the restrictions in the schema itself. With the background above in mind, here is a listing of the properties and a suggestions for the restrictions on them for discussion: Connection Class - connectionAuthority: exactly 1 - request: no restriction Request Class - requestURI: at most 1 - version: at most 1 - header properties: no restriction - additionalHeader: no restriction - body: no restriction - response: no restriction Response Class - version: at most 1 - responseCode: at most 1 - header properties: no restriction - additionalHeader: no restriction - body: no restriction Looking forward to your thoughts and suggestions. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 16:54:25 UTC