- From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:21:09 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org, Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Hi Shadi, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following today's discussion on the descriptions of test modes, please > find below an update of the proposed text based on the suggestions by > Jan Richards: > > > #### PROPOSED TEXT #### > - earl:manual > Where the test was carried out by a human. This includes the case where > the human was aided by instructions or guidance provided by a software > tool, but where the human has carried out the actual test procedure. > > - earl:semiAutomatic > Where the test was partially carried out by the software tool, but where > human input or judgment was still required to decide or help decide the > outcome of the test. > > - earl:automatic > Where the test was carried out automatically by the software tool and > without any human intervention. > > NOTE: the earl:CompoundAssertor class should be used to clarify where > combinations of humans and tools, or where collection of tools have > collectively carried out a test. > #### ############# #### +1. > Is this definition clearer now? Can you picture your most favorite tool > and easily find where it would fit in according to this definition? Yes, ;-) actually in the new version we will have the three of them ;-) > How > about your least favorite tool and some others in between? shall we worry about this ;-) regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT) BIKA Web Compliance Center - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 12:21:14 UTC