- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:12:24 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, During today's teleconference [1] we decided to explore ideas for a term to replace earl:notAvailable. It is currently defined as follows: <cite url="http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#testmode"> Where a combination of persons and/or software tools was used to carry out the test, but there is no detailed information about the primary responsibility for determining the outcome of the test. This includes when testing is carried out by organizations or groups of assertors, and the exact testing process is not disclosed. </cite> As a reminder, the use case for this property was for groups to have a mechanism to deliberately hide the test mode that was used. For example if a group of testers evaluates a page but do not want to disclose the exact methodology they've used. We had decided that this is a different case then leaving the information blank (which could equally mean that the information is missing rather than being suppressed). The following are suggestions that aim to be as concise yet clearer, please send your thoughts on these suggestions and add any others that you may think of: -notProvided -notSupplied -unknown or notKnown -undisclosed or notDisclosed -unspecified or notSpecified -unexposed or notExposed -suppressed -concealed -hidden Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 16:15:34 UTC