- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:27:26 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, Johannes Koch wrote: > This is possible for asterisk. But what do you think about abs_path, > absoluteURI or authority? Ah, yes because these have literal values. Right? Hmmm, I think we could define them as sub-classes of "Literal" because owl:Thing can indeed be any /thing/. Here is my rough idea for your consideration: ... <owl:Thing rdf:about="&http;#absoluteURI"> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Absolute URI</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A Literal Value</rdfs:comment> </owl:Thing> ... <rdfs:Class rdf:about="&http;#absoluteURI"> <rdfs:subclassOf rdf:resource="&xml;Literal"/> ... </rdf:Class> <http:OptionsRequest rdf:ID="req"> <http:requestURI rdf:parseType="&http;#absoluteURI">...</http:requestURI> ... </http:OptionsRequest> I think this could even be compacted to: ... <owl:Thing rdf:about="&http;#absoluteURI"> <rdfs:subclassOf rdf:resource="&xml;Literal"/> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Absolute URI</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A Literal Value</rdfs:comment> </owl:Thing> ... Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 13:27:35 UTC