- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:32:02 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Carlos Iglesias schrieb: > 2.3.3 HTTP Response > > "If an HTTP request fails for any reason during a test (network-level error, DNS resolution error, non-HTTP response, or server returns an HTTP 4xx or 5xx status), the test outcome should be considered FAIL" > > When not reaching the server it should be a not tested instead a fail (e.g 5xx server errors). Why is 5xx is mentioned here? > When the server returns 4xx or 5xx the result of the test should not fail, because otherwise the website as a hole could never be Mobile OK compliant (e.g. you can always make a request that will produce an 404 and thus a fail) > 2.4 CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT > > "If the response specifies an Internet media type that is not "text/css", "image/jpeg" or "image/gif", FAIL" > > Why are image/png or application/svg+xml not included in DDC (default definition context)? It's default _delivery_ context. > 3.15 OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPT > > "If the value of the href attribute begins with the "javascript:" scheme, FAIL" > > At least, href attributes with "#" value should also fail. > A wider definition which discourages not valid href values in general would be desirable. Again: what is 'not valid'? According to XHTML (DTD validity), the value of href attributes is just CDATA. According to the specification prose it must be a URI. Do we propose to use only URI schemes registered with IANA? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 08:32:29 UTC