- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:00:55 +0200
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >> During last weeks' teleconference we briefly discussed > refining the > >> cardinality constrains on the properties of the result class (by > >> defining appropriate min/maxCardinality restrictions). The current > >> proposal is to have exactly 1 validity and exactly 1 confidence > >> properties per result class. > > > > I believe we should have no confidence property for many > results, so > > it should be optional. > > My fault! I *did* mean exactly 1 validity and at most 1 confidence. +1 for 1 validity and at most 1 confidence (if we keep confidence) I don't like Chaals' proposal (multiple validates). I imagine an interoperability nightmare. Regards, CI. -------------------------------------- Carlos Iglesias CTIC Foundation Science and Technology Park of Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain phone: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 11:01:06 UTC