- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:44:09 +0200
- To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Chris, Chris Ridpath wrote: > A test that checks if the alt text is appropriate for the image. Company > "ABC" may have an accessibility testing system that checks alt text > against a know list of good alt text. They know their company logo must > have alt text of "ABC company logo". If the company logo image does not > have this alt text then it fails the test with a high confidence. > Company XYZ checks the same file, finds the company logo image, and > fails it with a low confidence. Aren't these actually different tests? (The test for company ABC is a refinement of the test for company XYZ but it is a new test in itself) > However, I'm now thinking that our "cannot tell" result may do just as > well. > > In the example above the result from ABC company would be "fail". They > know for sure that the alt text is incorrect. The result from company > XYZ would be "cannot tell" because they don't know what the alt text > should be. Yes, that is the current model. > It still might be helpful to know how confident the "cannot tell" result > is but I can live without it. How would you judge the confidence for such a test? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:44:15 UTC