- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:16:58 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > PROPOSAL 2: > * exactly 1 assertedBy property per assertion class > * at least 1 subject property per assertion class > * at least 1 test property per assertion class > * exactly 1 result property per assertion class > * at most 1 mode property per assertion class > > The > advantage of proposal 2 is that it allows for slightly more compact > reports (for example when different tests are run by the same tool, and > all tests share the same result). However, this comes at the price of > slightly more complex reports and overhead for the parsers (as well as > potential ambiguity). This reminds me of the RDF container concepts (Bag, Seq, Alt). Does proposal 2 also allow having one subject property with a bag referencing several test subjects? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 14:18:00 UTC