- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:45:54 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile schrieb: > The point is that warnings are used with such a total lack of > interoperability in terms of a validity level IMHO compilation is basically a black/white (fail/pass) thing like SGML validation. If there are compilation errors, it's a fail. Otherwise it's a pass. Having no errors but warnings is still a pass, but a special kind of pass. > that making an instance > class called warning is a bad idea unless we want to bring that level of > non-interoperability into EARL results. ACK -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 10:46:30 UTC