- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:18:40 +0100
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, "'David'" <drooks@segala.com>, "'Johannes Koch'" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, "'ERT group'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-ert- I think we need to say that implementors should find their own class as a subClass of pass, cannotTell, etc. Different people use different types of warning and putting one in is IMHO asking for people to get it wrong, [PW] I agree with Charles. Also, I have never witnessed the use of 'warnings' by testing professionals, so I'd hate to introduce new terminology that isn't necessary. As Shadi says, "some tools misuse 'warning' as a conditional pass". I think these tools are misused, some users assume they can measure compliance, this means 'warning' equals 'pass'. Scary! Kind regards Paul
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 14:18:51 UTC