- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:07:30 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb: > Beware, some (evaluation) tools misuse their "warning" flags to mean > "conditional pass" (as in "further manual checking needed" or such). In > EARL these should be "cannotTell" (or subclasses thereof). > > Similarly, many other "warning" should actually be subclasses of "pass". > For example "feature X is valid according to the CSS specification but > not supported by browser Y" is actually a pass. Yep, that's what I meant. Should we (evaluation tool creators) subclass these for use in our application? Or do we want to subclass them in EARL? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 10:07:53 UTC