- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:33:05 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dear Group, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/> During the previous weeks we have had the action items to read WCAG 2.0 and its accompanying documents. So far we have identified feedback on the baseline [1] as well as conformance [2] (from Johannes). How about the guidelines and success criteria themselves? * Are they unambiguous and precisely testable? * Are the assigned conformance levels appropriate? * Are there missing or unnecessary success criteria? Also comments on the overall understandability and usability of the document itself would be useful feedback for WCAG WG. Looking forward to your comments on this list, remember that the review period ends on Wednesday 31 May. Regards, Shadi [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006May/0066> [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006May/0047> -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:33:04 UTC