- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:50:29 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > In this case, I doubt the editors meant what this says: > > <rdf:Property rdf:about="&http-ns;allow"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Allow</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment>The Allow header</rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&http-ns;header"/> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Request"/> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Response"/> > </rdf:Property> > > that says that everything with an allow property is both a Request > _and_ a Response. See > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-and-range Hmm, I was not aware of this :-| Is there a way to specify that the allow propery can appear in both Request and Response? Is this necessary to specify? > Hmm... I also see http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-RFC822-in-RDF-20060216 ; > I don't care for the name/value approach there. Which is what we need for unknown fields. So at least the name/value part is still needed. I don't think we will need the specific fields in the current draft of RFC822-in-RDF. I just added them forcompleteness. Should I delete them? -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 10:51:06 UTC