- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:05:49 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/conformance> [2] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/baseline/> For this weeks' ERT teleconference everyone should read these two documents linked above carefully and be prepared to comment on them. The question we should be asking while reviewing these documents is: can the WCAG 2.0 conformance model be optimized to make evaluation processes more *efficient*, *repeatable*, and *transparent*? Note that recent discussions on conformance claims (see summary of these discussions sent by Christophe Strobbe to the WCAG WG list [3]) are part of the review feedback that we can provide for WCAG WG. [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006AprJun/0181> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 08:06:02 UTC