- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:54:32 +0100
- To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>, <public-xg-wcl@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Sorcha Moore'" <sorcha@segala.com>
For the benefit of the group, WCAG 2.0 hasn't been officially agreed yet but I don't think there are anymore 'major' changes. Sorcha? -----Original Message----- From: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shadi Abou-Zahra Sent: 04 May 2006 10:01 To: public-wai-ert@w3.org; public-xg-wcl@w3.org Subject: WCAG 2.0 Conformance Claims Hi, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/conformance#conformance-claims> In ERT WG we've been having an on-going discussion about conformance claims. Can someone from WCL XG describe how well RDF-CL can address WCAG 2.0 conformance claims and maybe also provide some example code? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 09:54:41 UTC